Total prize hits
291.7
per 10'000 picks · random: 290.6
Swiss Lotto · Strategy backtesting
Consecutive Numbers strategy - Swiss Lotto benchmark & results
Lotteries
The Consecutive Numbers strategy prioritizes neighboring numbers such as 12-13 or 31-32 that appeared together. The historical analysis on this page evaluates 105 archived draws in the active window. The metrics on this page describe behaviour only within Swiss Lotto and do not predict future results.
What does the Consecutive Numbers strategy do?
This strategy weights neighboring numbers such as 12-13 or 31-32 that appeared together and compares the outcome with the exact random baseline inside the same lottery. It shows how the method behaved in the archive with 5,000 × 100 lines per draw in the selected run, without promising a future edge.
Who is this strategy for?
For players who want to include natural number runs. It is most useful as structured historical context without mixing the benchmark with extra user filters.
Important note
Past frequencies do not guarantee future results. LottoLab shows historical benchmark data, not a winning-number prediction. Raw deltas per 10,000 lines are most useful within the same lottery; for Swiss Lotto versus EuroMillions, relative uplift is the fairer cross-lottery view.
Historical analysis of the Consecutive Numbers strategy
Last 365 days · published 28 Apr 2026
Delta vs random
+1.0
Raw difference inside the same lottery
Relative uplift
+0.4%
against this lottery's exact random baseline
Strongest class
3 numbers
Last 365 days
Prize-class comparison
Official prize classes compared historically with the exact random baseline.
| Class | Strategy / 10'000 | Exact random / 10'000 | Delta / 10'000 | Total hits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 numbers + Lucky Number | <0.05 | <0.05 | practically equal | 2 |
| 6 numbers | <0.05 | <0.05 | practically equal | 10 |
| 5 numbers + Lucky Number | 0.07 | 0.07 | practically equal | 372 |
| 5 numbers | 0.32 | 0.34 | practically equal | 1,660 |
| 4 numbers + Lucky Number | 3.0 | 3.0 | practically equal | 15,553 |
| 4 numbers | 14.8 | 15.0 | -0.21 | 77,711 |
| 3 numbers + Lucky Number | 45.5 | 45.4 | +0.10 | 238,702 |
| 3 numbers | 228.0 | 226.8 | +1.2 | 1,197,243 |
6 numbers + Lucky Number
practically equal
practically equal
about 1 hit per 26,250,000 picks
- Strategy
- <0.05
- Random
- <0.05
- Total hits
- 2
6 numbers
practically equal
practically equal
about 1 hit per 5,250,000 picks
- Strategy
- <0.05
- Random
- <0.05
- Total hits
- 10
5 numbers + Lucky Number
practically equal
practically equal
about 1 hit per 141,130 picks
- Strategy
- 0.07
- Random
- 0.07
- Total hits
- 372
5 numbers
practically equal
practically equal
about 1 hit per 29,144 picks
- Strategy
- 0.32
- Random
- 0.34
- Total hits
- 1,660
4 numbers + Lucky Number
practically equal
practically equal
- Strategy
- 3.0
- Random
- 3.0
- Total hits
- 15,553
4 numbers
-0.21
historically lower
- Strategy
- 14.8
- Random
- 15.0
- Total hits
- 77,711
3 numbers + Lucky Number
+0.10
historically higher
- Strategy
- 45.5
- Random
- 45.4
- Total hits
- 238,702
3 numbers
+1.2
historically higher
- Strategy
- 228.0
- Random
- 226.8
- Total hits
- 1,197,243
All rates use the selected normalization. Positive deltas show more historical hits than exact random selection; they are not predictions.
Methodology
105 draws · 52,500,000 combinations analyzed · published 28 Apr 2026. Historical, reproducible, and not predictive.
Show technical details
go_phase1
Benchmark version
dev+srcd0017277
Code version
500
Min. draws
5,000
Combinations per draw
100
Repeats per draw
Exact random + matched baseline
Baseline
Frequently asked questions
What does the Consecutive Numbers strategy mean for Swiss Lotto?
It prioritizes neighboring numbers such as 12-13 or 31-32 that appeared together and creates structured picks for historical comparison.
Is the Consecutive Numbers strategy better than random?
That depends on the active window. Inside Swiss Lotto, the key measures are prize hits per 10,000 lines and the difference against the exact random baseline shown above. For cross-lottery comparison, relative uplift is the fairer lens. This remains descriptive, not predictive.
Can I combine it with filters?
Yes in the generator. The benchmark on this page intentionally keeps the default strategy without additional user filters.
How often is the benchmark updated?
The currently published benchmark data was updated on 28 Apr 2026.